Search keywords
Basics
| all submissions in the search category |
| “story” in title, abstract, authors Search uses fields visible to the searcher. For example, PC member searches do not examine authors. |
| submission #119 |
| submissions in the numbered set with “kernel” in title, abstract, authors |
| “802” in title, abstract, authors (not submission #802) |
| “very” and “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| the same |
| the phrase “very new” in title, abstract, authors |
| either “very” or “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| use parentheses to group |
| “very” but not “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| the same |
| words that start with “ve” in title, abstract, authors |
| words that contain “me” in title, abstract, authors |
Title
| title contains “flexible” |
Abstract
| abstract contains “very novel” |
Authors
| author list contains “poletto” |
| more than four authors |
Collaborators
| collaborators contains “liskov” |
Topics
| selected topics match “link” |
Submission fields
| submission’s Ethics Consideration field is set Also has:IntDefPri, has:DisPapAwa, has:ArtEva, has:PriRev, has:PriCon |
| submission’s Prior Conference field contains ‘words’ |
Tags
| tagged “discuss” (“tag:discuss” also works) |
| not tagged “discuss” |
| tagged “discuss”, sort by tag order (“rorder:” for reverse order) |
| matches any tag that starts with “disc” |
Reviews
| you are a reviewer |
| “fdabek” in reviewer name/email |
| four reviewers (assigned and/or completed) |
| less than three completed reviews Use “cre:<3” for short. |
| at least one incomplete review |
| at least one in-progress review (started, but not completed) |
| at least two primary reviewers |
| at least one secondary reviewer |
| at least one external reviewer |
| “fdabek” has completed a primary review |
| has a review with less than 100 words in author-visible fields |
| has a positively-rated review (“rate:bad”, “rate:biased”, etc. also work) |
| has a positively-rated review by you |
Review fields
| at least one completed review has a nonempty Paper summary field Also DetComAut:any, EthCon.2:any, ComEthCon:any, ReqCha:any, ReaAccPap:any, ReaNotAcc:any, RecDec:any, QueAutRes:any, WriQua:any, ConRecDec:any, ReaAftRes:any |
| at least one completed review has “finger” in the Paper summary field |
| at least one completed review has an empty Paper summary field Also DetComAut:empty, ComEthCon:empty, ReqCha:empty, ReaAccPap:empty, ReaNotAcc:empty, QueAutRes:empty, ReaAftRes:empty |
| at least one completed review has Ethics consideration 2 Also RecDec:value, WriQua:value, ConRecDec:value |
| at least one completed review has Ethics consideration greater than 2 Also RecDec:comparison, WriQua:comparison, ConRecDec:comparison |
| at least one completed review has Ethics consideration in the 2–3 range Also RecDec:any:v1-v2, WriQua:any:v1-v2, ConRecDec:any:v1-v2 |
| all completed reviews have Ethics consideration in the 2–3 range |
| Ethics consideration in completed reviews spans the 2–3 range This means all scores between 2 and 3, with at least one 2 and at least one 3. |
| at least 4 completed reviews have Ethics consideration 2 |
| exactly 2 completed reviews have Ethics consideration 2 |
Comments
| at least one visible reviewer comment (not including authors’ response) |
| at least three visible reviewer comments |
| at least one reviewer comment visible to authors |
| “sylvia” (in name/email) wrote at least one visible comment; can combine with counts, use reviewer tags |
| has author’s response |
| at least two visible comments, possibly including author’s response |
Leads
| “fdabek” (in name/email) is discussion lead |
| no assigned discussion lead |
| some assigned discussion lead |
Shepherds
| “fdabek” (in name/email) is shepherd (“none” and “any” also work) |
Conflicts
| you have a conflict with the submission |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) has a conflict with the submission This search is only available to chairs and to PC members who can see the submission’s author list. |
| some PC member has a conflict with the submission |
| at least three PC members have conflicts with the submission |
| a reviewer of submission 1, 2, or 3 has a conflict with the submission |
Preferences
| you have preference 3 |
| a PC member’s preference has expertise “X” (expert) |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) has preference > 0 Administrators can search preferences by name; PC members can only search preferences for the PC as a whole. |
Status
| submission is ready for review |
| submission is incomplete (neither ready nor withdrawn) |
| submission has been withdrawn |
| final version uploaded |
Decisions
| decision is “R2 Accept” (partial matches OK) |
| one of the accept decisions |
| one of the reject decisions |
| decision specified |
| decision unspecified |
Formulas
| all reviews have Ethics consideration score 2 Formulas can express complex numerical queries across review scores and preferences. |
| “f” is shorthand for “formula” |
| variance in EthCon.2 is above 0.5 |
| at least one reviewer had Ethics consideration score 2 and review preference < 0 |
Display
| show tags and PC conflicts in the results |
| hide title in the results |
| show a formula |
| sort by score |
| sort by score variance |
| sort by reverse status |
| edit the values for tag “#discuss” |
| like “search1 OR search2”, but submissions matching “search1” are grouped together and appear earlier in the sorting order |
| faceted display |
| search for “search1”, but highlight submissions in that list that match “search2” (also try HIGHLIGHT:pink, HIGHLIGHT:green, HIGHLIGHT:blue) |